AARM – Activists Against Racism Movement

Howard J. Eagle

It’s been a long time since I read a newspaper article and became really pissed off, but that definitely occurred on the evening of February 23rd — in the process of reading (several times) an article titled ‘College leaders back mayoral control of Rochester schools’ — published on the Democrat and Chronicle’s website.

My initial thought was, and still is, that even if 119 or 1,019 college presidents from around the world declared their support for mayoral control — that wouldn’t change my mind one little bit (if for no other reason) because I’ll never support (under any circumstances or conditions) the idea of diminishing predominantly poor African American and Hispanic peoples suffrage rights — never!

I asked myself (out loud) how could college presidents (of all people) be so ignorant? However, once I got over the initial shock of what I had read — it dawned on me that they aren’t really ignorant at all. People don’t become presidents of colleges and universities, especially internationally known, top-rated universities, by being ignorant — or do they?

With regard to this particular situation — I concluded that the gang of 19 was fully aware of what they were doing. That is, they had made a collective, conscious, choice (at his request) to back the smooth-talking, fair-haired, hometown all American Mayor — even if it was at the expense of the lives and futures of our children. Like Duffy (politically speaking), they had chosen “the hill that they are willing to die on.”  That is, the national hill of Arnold Duncan school-of -thought and direction (privatization today — privatization tomorrow — privatization forever).

What really dawned on me though was that this is no longer a normal, run-of-the-mill debate. People, especially Robert Duffy is really playing hard-ball politics. I also thought about how correct Rochester City Councilman Adam McFadden had been several weeks earlier (1/14/10) when, as a guest on Bob Smith’s WXXI radio talk show — he had mentioned the possibility of the mayoral control issue tearing the community apart in a manner that we haven’t seen for many years. This possibility and probability certainly is evidenced by the fact that we now have top leaders of local colleges and universities taking a public position that is diametrically opposed to the position taken by some of the most notable professors and researchers working at those same colleges and universities. Several outstanding examples that immediately come to mind include the position of Joel Seligman vis-a-vis that of Dr. David Hursh; Dr. William Destler vis-a-vis distinguished professor of public policy and former Rochester mayor William Johnson, and Daan Braveman vis-a-vis professor and former Fairport, NY and Rochester City School District Superintendent, Dr. William Cala. Perhaps this is all part of healthy dialogue, but one thing for sure is — it is not part of the norm.
The actual letter of support, which was endorsed by “the presidents of every major higher learning institution in the area,” and sent to the president and Publisher of the Democrat and Chronicle — is really quite amazing. The first amazing thing about it is that, according to the above referenced article, the presidents had made a decision to support Duffy as early as 2/3/10. A full twenty days after the decision was made, the original version of the 2/23/10 letter from 19 top-level “academians” contained at least two typos. I don’t mean to nit-pick, but is it not reasonable to expect excellence from this group?

In their soon to be infamous letter, these “academians” claim that they “realize that all involved in this discussion want the best for our students…” Our students? By their own admission (no pun intended) most RCSD students never even come close to gaining entrance into their colleges and universities. Another very amazing thing about their letter and position is that they magically connect the latter fact to the issue of “governance” within the RCSD — amazing!

With regard to the issue of RCSD governance (as a guest on Bob Smith’s WXXI radio talk show on 2/11/10) former Rochester mayor and distinguished RIT professor of public policy, William Johnson is quoted as having said the following: “My view is that we need to look at the more basic issues here. I think we need to look at how to reform the delivery of urban education, not the governance structure. I think, to be fair — to say that you’re going to disrupt a whole $700 million structure — subsume it into your organization, and if it doesn’t work after 4 years, you will take it and send it back — you can’t put humpty-dumpty back together again, after you have made all those changes, and I think that we (as a community) need to understand that it is easier said than done. It has been tried by people much smarter than Bob Duffy and Bill Johnson, and they haven’t been able to make it work. It has been tried by communities all over the country. With all due respect to Mayor Duffy (a man who I admire; a man who I supported for election; a man who I worked with for 12 years; a man whose sincerity I do not question in the least bit) — I think he is biting off a lot more than he can chew (as we say down South), particularly given some of the other challenges which this City faces at this particular point and time.”

Also, in their letter — in the process of pointing out extremely poor performance on English Exams by 8th graders at two RCSD schools — the intellectual “dream-team” made the blatantly obvious point that “students who cannot understand what they are reading, cannot succeed in high school,” (no kidding). What’s most interesting about this observation is that if anyone should know, these super-intellectuals certainly should know that mounds of research exists, which supports the vital need for successful students to be reading at or above grade level by or about 3rd grade. Thus, the critical task is not to just point out that schools have huge numbers of students who are light-years away from where they should be relative to basic skills-development. In so doing, they are only describing a symptom, which almost anyone can do, but the real fundamental issue and problem that must be solved is figuring out and eliminating that which allows for “84%” or “85%” of a school’s student body to reach 8th grade without having acquired basic reading, writing and math skills. This is absolutely one of the most critical issues that must be thoroughly addressed in any legitimate, authentic, urban education reform model. Since we know that Board of Education members are not directly responsible for teaching reading, writing and arithmetic — I can’t wait to hear the academic leaders explain how this and other such fundamentally critical issues are related to RCSD governance. Clearly as professor Johnson pointed out — this is an educational delivery issue, as opposed to one of governance.

Furthermore, when intellectuals begin hypocritically spewing rhetoric about poor academic “results [being] especially tragic in Rochester, a city with a proud history of quality educational institutions that has fueled entrepreneurialism, innovation and creativity for almost two centuries” — then we can be absolutely certain that they don’t have the best interests of the majority of our students in mind or at heart. Remember the history. “Two centuries” ago the ancestors of the overwhelming majority of our students couldn’t get near the “quality educational institutions,”  which the intellectuals referenced in their letter.

They also make the bogus claim that “there is considerable evidence that mayoral control improves outcomes from cities as diverse at [their typo] New York City, Boston, New Haven, Hartford, Cleveland, Washington D.C. and Chicago.” I say if “considerable evidence” exists — they should produce it now.

The president of Finger Lakes Community College was quoted as having the audacity to say that “overwhelming research shows [mayoral control] has delivered good results.” Wow! Again I say, if “overwhelming” evidence exists — they should produce it now.

It’s difficult to determine whose statements (the intellectual’s or Duffy’s) are most ludicrous and absurd. With regard to the gang of 19, the Mayor is quoted as having said “I think they are as connected as anybody could be…”  Incredible! Imagine that. I mean really imagine that this guy is serious. He really means this — I think.

We (RCSD parents and concerned community members in general) absolutely cannot allow the likes of Duffy and/or totally disconnected intellectuals , or anyone else for that matter — to preside over the destruction of another generation of our children without being at every major decision-making table.

We must continue to organize!!!

President Dahl,

I am writing in response to a letter I just came across written by the “Rochester Area Colleges” expressing their support for Mayor Duffy’s takeover of the Rochester City School District. Your name and that of your college was signed to it.

My reason for writing you specifically is, I graduated from your college in the summer of 2008 before moving back to my home city of Rochester. As an active resident of the city (most of my work in the community revolves around anti-racist education and youth empowerment), I am absolutely appalled that the name of my old college—the same institution that taught me so much about thinking critically and actively engaging in the world around me—is being attached to a document as misleading (and in fact dangerous!) as your letter to the Democrat and Chronicle dated February 23, 2010.

Since you yourself (and apparently every president of our local universities) seem to be confused about the facts, I must correct a claim made in your letter, which states: “There is considerable evidence that mayoral control improves outcomes from cities as diverse as New York City, Boston, New Haven, Hartford, Cleveland, Washington D.C., and Chicago.” In case you are not aware, THIS IS ABSOLUTELY FALSE INFORMATION. It is the same rhetorical nonsense that was put out by our mayor and his cronies in December to trick city residents into blindly, quietly consenting to his takeover.

The TRUTH is, in the cities where mayoral control has been implemented, there has been an INCREASE in the racial achievement gap, an INCREASE in the incarceration of youth, and in many cases, a DECREASE in graduation rates (especially among black and latino men). Your letter speaks of damaging statistics in 8th grade reading and math at Franklin and East high schools, but are you aware of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) results that state very clearly that students in NYC—a district under mayoral control since 2002, cited by your very letter—have shown NO gains in either 8th grade reading or 8th grade math?

THIS is only a small portion of the misinformation that is out there—misinformation you are perpetuating by signing your name in support of mayoral control. Many community members have been desperately working to correct this misinformation since it was first put out to the public in late December: teach-ins have been had; experts have spoken publicly and written articles; parents, students, teachers, and other community members have held pickets and gone door to door in the freezing cold in an attempt to further spread the word. We’ve even been to Albany and back. And by signing your name and that of your respected institution, you are effectively undoing the work we have done.

I should be clear and state that there are a few statements your letter makes that I would absolutely agree with: 1) that the high rate of poverty in the city makes an effective K-12 program all the more important; 2) that the stakes are very high; and 3) that the current system of school governance is not working for our children. These statements are all very closely related. Poverty (which encompasses joblessness and poor healthcare) is a problem our mayor has the power to influence, to change. In fact, to a great extent, that is precisely what he was elected to do; and he hasn’t done it yet. Why, if he cannot do the job he was elected to do, would we give him more centralized power and responsibility? Does it take a dictator to solve the problems of a community? Why not further empower the community to solve its own problems—to further democratize the system? This is what I was taught over and over when I was a student on your campus. And this is what has worked throughout history. Mayoral control has not.

But please don’t take my word for it. Check out the works of Dr. William Cala and David Hursh, two local experts who have written extensively on this subject.

Our children and community have been played with for far too long. What we need—what has been shown to work over and over in both urban schools and suburban schools—is more community involvement, not less. If you are concerned about the future of these children—all of whom have the potential to one day attend your campus, just as I did—then I strongly urge you, as a person of power and influence, to withdraw your support for mayoral control of the Rochester City School District.

Indeed, the stakes are high. Please do the right thing.

Sincerely,

Tim Adams
(Class of 2008)
Youth Empowerment Committee
Activists Against Racism Movement